In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which vary depending over the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation in the state court might not be appropriate, or maybe accepted, in the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a move into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, gives financial relief by positioning an employee within a higher pay scale, without transforming their occupation duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same pay out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is really a policy Device used to relieve the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised on the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist confident them read more that they had practically nothing to worry about.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or Female do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they can Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed within the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and in many cases are not the court's final opinion.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This example of case law refers to 2 cases heard inside the state court, at the same level.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of regulation.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive companies based on statutes.